Peter Ludemann on Nostr: nprofile1q…336ju But what if the "executive order" is that federal employees can ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq78rvtslm3qykq8uy5afswta2qz5pk9atjxsepht4x8ldddssp6kqf336ju (nprofile…36ju)
But what if the "executive order" is that federal employees can only serve people who are wearing their underwear outside their clothing?
Or would this be unconstitutional because it would affect the rest of us's sartorial choices (not that freedom of sartorial choice is anywhere in the Constitution AFAIK, but maybe there's an implied freedom ...)
[Although this is obviously weird, I can think of less weird EOs that have nasty knock-on effects, such as non-citizens can only be served between 8:00 and 8:15]
But what if the "executive order" is that federal employees can only serve people who are wearing their underwear outside their clothing?
Or would this be unconstitutional because it would affect the rest of us's sartorial choices (not that freedom of sartorial choice is anywhere in the Constitution AFAIK, but maybe there's an implied freedom ...)
[Although this is obviously weird, I can think of less weird EOs that have nasty knock-on effects, such as non-citizens can only be served between 8:00 and 8:15]