Ian on Nostr: Satoshi wrote in 2010: "I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of ...
Satoshi wrote in 2010: "I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea. So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network.”
As this will obviously not be a mining or even full node what is the benefit? I guess why?
Published at
2024-03-24 17:43:42Event JSON
{
"id": "676cbedbb46deb4db1bb59f8deb9acb90627a21cb53d0eae2e54de616c80a686",
"pubkey": "1c170357d70ecb80ac87b7184047af7babeab5e3ccdeec84017b40ae3cdf813a",
"created_at": 1711302222,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2d67bc5fb2df07b2b9e9b1d1d519f8cea44ba577de569f148531ce50d514c445",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dbe0605a9c73172bad7523a327b236d55ea4b634e80e78a9013db791f8fd5b2c"
],
[
"e",
"2d67bc5fb2df07b2b9e9b1d1d519f8cea44ba577de569f148531ce50d514c445",
"",
"root"
]
],
"content": "Satoshi wrote in 2010: \"I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea. So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network.”\n\nAs this will obviously not be a mining or even full node what is the benefit? I guess why?",
"sig": "2883a13ce8dc825b116eefc22dc8f0d15e58c75c7a9ff010a5a525585c208ee6a3aaa34a8bc2aca5e6868e06090e4a51a53da65cc23410ff160d54499cfc5101"
}
