jan matejek [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2019-07-31 š Original message:hello, On 31. 07. 19 3:13, ...
š
Original date posted:2019-07-31
š Original message:hello,
On 31. 07. 19 3:13, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Lastly, I would like to propose the canonical method for mult-byte
> types. We designate a specific type to indicate that the type is
> multiple bytes. When such types are observed, parsers should move onto
> the next byte and interpret that as the type, keeping in mind the number
> of bytes that were read in for the type.
why not use Bitcoin compact uint, which most PSBT consumers already
implement?
regards
m.
š Original message:hello,
On 31. 07. 19 3:13, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Lastly, I would like to propose the canonical method for mult-byte
> types. We designate a specific type to indicate that the type is
> multiple bytes. When such types are observed, parsers should move onto
> the next byte and interpret that as the type, keeping in mind the number
> of bytes that were read in for the type.
why not use Bitcoin compact uint, which most PSBT consumers already
implement?
regards
m.