SiAmolyn on Nostr: ...
不要拿中國人素質低的問題來談論民主是否適合中國。這是本末倒置，中國人的整體素質低究其根本原因是因為CCP推行了愚民教育，跟本不在意提升國民素質。可以看看同源的台灣，香港，甚至新加坡，都具有非常高的國民素質水平。更不用說雖然同樣受到儒家文化毒害的日本了。
I surely doNOT agree with that “Chinese ppl is low level of national quality, and democracy is for high level of ppl quality. So dictatorships is good for China.” It’s a totally unacceptable logic. The reason for low level of ppl quality is that CCP using their methods of “fool ppl” education. We were taught with only one sound, and with NO critical thinking. The CCP is afraid of over 1 billion well educated ppl. Cuz when ppl are talent enough to realize what the gov is really doing, it would be a threat to the gov.
On the other side of the fence, ROC (Taiwan), HK, even Singapore, they are also Chinese origin, and share the same culture with mainland China. But they are well known with height level of national quality.
Not to mention Japan, which shares the Confucian culture (which is bad), but welcome the democracy decades ago (which is good).
I surely doNOT agree with that “Chinese ppl is low level of national quality, and democracy is for high level of ppl quality. So dictatorships is good for China.” It’s a totally unacceptable logic. The reason for low level of ppl quality is that CCP using their methods of “fool ppl” education. We were taught with only one sound, and with NO critical thinking. The CCP is afraid of over 1 billion well educated ppl. Cuz when ppl are talent enough to realize what the gov is really doing, it would be a threat to the gov.
On the other side of the fence, ROC (Taiwan), HK, even Singapore, they are also Chinese origin, and share the same culture with mainland China. But they are well known with height level of national quality.
Not to mention Japan, which shares the Confucian culture (which is bad), but welcome the democracy decades ago (which is good).