Chad on Nostr: Oh ok. I agree that truth should correspond to reality. I also agree that intuition ...

Oh ok.
I agree that truth should correspond to reality.
I also agree that intuition can be flawed and unreliable, my point is just that that's how it seems we work for better or for worse.

Do you think it's possible to not include intuition from moral reasoning?

I think a concrete example could help before things start getting too abstract:
How would one objectively evaluate the moral truth of sacrificing an innocent life for another without using intuition?

I'm curious about your perspective.