Airstrip One News on Nostr: Foreign Fraudster WINS ECHR Return Only in Britain could you be deported for breaking ...
Foreign Fraudster WINS ECHR Return
Only in Britain could you be deported for breaking the law… and then invited back because you felt a bit down about it.
Samuel Frimpong, a Ghanaian fraudster booted out of the UK 12 years ago, has been allowed to return under human rights laws because – wait for it – being separated from his family made him depressed. Yes, you read that right. A criminal, convicted of using fake documents to bypass our immigration rules, is now being flown back in thanks to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
An immigration judge decided that deporting Frimpong was an “unjustifiable interference” with his right to a family life.
And it doesn’t stop there. We’ve seen this same circus play out time and time again – an Albanian criminal dodging deportation because his son allegedly refused to eat foreign chicken nuggets. A Pakistani paedophile escaping removal because it would be “too harsh” on his kids. The list goes on. The Home Office tries to uphold the law, and activist judges swat them down like an inconvenience.
Meanwhile, there are 34,169 outstanding immigration appeals, the majority citing “human rights.” And yet, Sir Keir Starmer, the man who built his legal career on defending open borders, suddenly wants us to believe he’ll crack down on abuse?
Pull the other one.
in non of this is the human rights of the native population even considerd.
Only in Britain could you be deported for breaking the law… and then invited back because you felt a bit down about it.
Samuel Frimpong, a Ghanaian fraudster booted out of the UK 12 years ago, has been allowed to return under human rights laws because – wait for it – being separated from his family made him depressed. Yes, you read that right. A criminal, convicted of using fake documents to bypass our immigration rules, is now being flown back in thanks to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
An immigration judge decided that deporting Frimpong was an “unjustifiable interference” with his right to a family life.
And it doesn’t stop there. We’ve seen this same circus play out time and time again – an Albanian criminal dodging deportation because his son allegedly refused to eat foreign chicken nuggets. A Pakistani paedophile escaping removal because it would be “too harsh” on his kids. The list goes on. The Home Office tries to uphold the law, and activist judges swat them down like an inconvenience.
Meanwhile, there are 34,169 outstanding immigration appeals, the majority citing “human rights.” And yet, Sir Keir Starmer, the man who built his legal career on defending open borders, suddenly wants us to believe he’ll crack down on abuse?
Pull the other one.
in non of this is the human rights of the native population even considerd.