Delta Charlie on Nostr: Thanks for the well thought out input. I'll try to comment in the order you wrote ...
Thanks for the well thought out input. I'll try to comment in the order you wrote them.
The personal "attacks" were intentional because 2600 operates under the authoritarian dictatorship of one person.
Growing food is an act of self-reliance, which aligns with my own personal philosophy, but more importantly rebels against government grown and controlled resources, like food.
Hacking can be politically motivated. But a hacker magazine should focus on simply hacking the technology, not the reasons the politically motivated hacker is doing it.
I do suggest Tor, but there are many other ways to be private even in the clear web.
Zerohedge can be used with proper privacy and security practices, so the data tracked is garbage anyway. The essence if that point is Zerohedge goes against the grain with what they report. The fact that they track the users isn't something I agree with, but the users are smart enough not to be tracked. The content is still good.
Shadowstats is about understanding the theft the government performs by debasing the currency, and the lies they tell the Americans. Privacy practice can be applied here too.
Using Tor is only one way. Firefox can be hardened, a VPN can be used, and the clear web can be browsed privately. The situation will dictate.
The article was meant to be long. I received direct emails from readers of the print magazine with much support. The reason it was one long article was because it is a quarterly magazine, and your article gets printed in the next next issue, so 6 months later.
I have had legitimate debate. The magazine actively censors, so the debate wasn't really a debate, rather an orchestrated propaganda campaign crafted to appear as a debate. See the letters section, and the following printed issue. Also, not all my responses get printed in the magazine because they censor.
If you'd like to schedule a call, I'd be glad to elaborate on everything. You can even make a podcast out of it. Thank you for the well thought out responses.
The personal "attacks" were intentional because 2600 operates under the authoritarian dictatorship of one person.
Growing food is an act of self-reliance, which aligns with my own personal philosophy, but more importantly rebels against government grown and controlled resources, like food.
Hacking can be politically motivated. But a hacker magazine should focus on simply hacking the technology, not the reasons the politically motivated hacker is doing it.
I do suggest Tor, but there are many other ways to be private even in the clear web.
Zerohedge can be used with proper privacy and security practices, so the data tracked is garbage anyway. The essence if that point is Zerohedge goes against the grain with what they report. The fact that they track the users isn't something I agree with, but the users are smart enough not to be tracked. The content is still good.
Shadowstats is about understanding the theft the government performs by debasing the currency, and the lies they tell the Americans. Privacy practice can be applied here too.
Using Tor is only one way. Firefox can be hardened, a VPN can be used, and the clear web can be browsed privately. The situation will dictate.
The article was meant to be long. I received direct emails from readers of the print magazine with much support. The reason it was one long article was because it is a quarterly magazine, and your article gets printed in the next next issue, so 6 months later.
I have had legitimate debate. The magazine actively censors, so the debate wasn't really a debate, rather an orchestrated propaganda campaign crafted to appear as a debate. See the letters section, and the following printed issue. Also, not all my responses get printed in the magazine because they censor.
If you'd like to schedule a call, I'd be glad to elaborate on everything. You can even make a podcast out of it. Thank you for the well thought out responses.