Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-17 📝 Original message:On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-12-17
📝 Original message:On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:58:02PM +0000, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This is really the most important question.
>
> Bitcoin is kind of like a republic where there is separation of powers
> between various groups.
>
> The power blocs in the process include
>
> - Core Devs
> - Miners
> - Exchanges
> - Merchants
> - Customers
>
> Complete agreement is not required for a change. If merchants and their
> customers were to switch to different software, then there is little any of
> the other groups could do.

If Bitcoin remains decentralized, miners have veto power over any
blocksize increases. You can always soft-fork in a blocksize reduction
in a decentralized blockchain that actually works.

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000001bd68962863e6fa34e9776df361d4926912f52fc5f4b618
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151217/704b0752/attachment.sig>;