sovereignbull on Nostr: No, I'm was describing the nature of this system is to seek equilibrium, be it ...
No, I'm was describing the nature of this system is to seek equilibrium, be it through pressure mediation or dielectricity accelerating towards counterspace. When you open a pressured container it instantly equalizes with the environment. Vacuums don't exist in nature. It was Aristotle who said 'nature abhors a vacuum', suggesting nature cannot tolerate a void or empty space. And I would say he was correct, we don't observe vacuums in nature, only Hollywood fiction and imagination.
I'm not sure you read all of what I last posted. I understand the terms are technical. I'm not trying to hide behind technical jargon. I have had to read and listen to the same things over and over to build a mental model and understanding. I clearly stated that magnetic attraction doesn't exist. It sounds like a distinction without a difference, but what we call magnetic attraction is dielectric acceleration. This is a very important difference. There is no force involved. It is the same as a pressured container equalizing once open. There is no force involved in that, either. It is the system equalizing to it's natural state of rest and equilibrium. Forget forces, not even gravity is claimed to be a force.
'If you want to understand the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration' - Tesla
What he was getting at here is all matter is energy at varying high frequencies. All matter induces current in the Aether. That means all matter is dielectric in nature. You, me, that desk, a car. Everything.
Electricity, magnetism, and gravity are all expressions of dielectricity. Any object falling to the ground is the result of dielectricity seeking its null point, accelerating towards counterspace, or a state of rest. It really is that simple, but understanding it isn't quite as simple because we have to throw out the indoctrinated assumptions we make based on fallacies we believe to be true, and there are a lot of prerequisites we need to grasp for that understanding to fall into place.
Just like light doesn't actually travel, it is the rate of induction of the Aether and it has a speed limit depending on the density of the medium is it being perceived through. The rate of induction is inversely proportional to the density of the medium. The satisfactorily explains why light is perceived to be travelling at different rates through different mediums, otherwise, one would have to explain where light gets the energy to speed up again once it exists a material object such as a glass.
Even if the Earth was a spinning ball, this would still be the best explanation for what gravity is.
I'm not sure you read all of what I last posted. I understand the terms are technical. I'm not trying to hide behind technical jargon. I have had to read and listen to the same things over and over to build a mental model and understanding. I clearly stated that magnetic attraction doesn't exist. It sounds like a distinction without a difference, but what we call magnetic attraction is dielectric acceleration. This is a very important difference. There is no force involved. It is the same as a pressured container equalizing once open. There is no force involved in that, either. It is the system equalizing to it's natural state of rest and equilibrium. Forget forces, not even gravity is claimed to be a force.
'If you want to understand the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration' - Tesla
What he was getting at here is all matter is energy at varying high frequencies. All matter induces current in the Aether. That means all matter is dielectric in nature. You, me, that desk, a car. Everything.
Electricity, magnetism, and gravity are all expressions of dielectricity. Any object falling to the ground is the result of dielectricity seeking its null point, accelerating towards counterspace, or a state of rest. It really is that simple, but understanding it isn't quite as simple because we have to throw out the indoctrinated assumptions we make based on fallacies we believe to be true, and there are a lot of prerequisites we need to grasp for that understanding to fall into place.
Just like light doesn't actually travel, it is the rate of induction of the Aether and it has a speed limit depending on the density of the medium is it being perceived through. The rate of induction is inversely proportional to the density of the medium. The satisfactorily explains why light is perceived to be travelling at different rates through different mediums, otherwise, one would have to explain where light gets the energy to speed up again once it exists a material object such as a glass.
Even if the Earth was a spinning ball, this would still be the best explanation for what gravity is.