Benjamin Lindner [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: π Original date posted:2013-03-15 π Original message:On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:18 ...
π
Original date posted:2013-03-15
π Original message:On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Cameron Garnham <da2ce7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> For me, everyone signed up to bitcoin thinking that there was a 1MB /
> block limit. The lock limits were unexpected, and could be considered
> extremely uncontroversial to remove.
This. Software behavior which is not described by the source code should not be considered an integral part of the rule set.
Any influence of external libraries on the consensus mechanism is unacceptable.
π Original message:On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Cameron Garnham <da2ce7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> For me, everyone signed up to bitcoin thinking that there was a 1MB /
> block limit. The lock limits were unexpected, and could be considered
> extremely uncontroversial to remove.
This. Software behavior which is not described by the source code should not be considered an integral part of the rule set.
Any influence of external libraries on the consensus mechanism is unacceptable.