gb [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2018-03-01 š Original message: .... and any thoughts on ...
š
Original date posted:2018-03-01
š Original message:
.... and any thoughts on protections against flood pinging?
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 09:45 -0500, Jim Posen wrote:
> The main benefit is that this should make it quicker to send a
> successful payment because latency is lower than sending an actual
> payment and the sender could ping all possible routes in parallel,
> whereas they can't send multiple payments in parallel. The main
> downside I can think of is that, by the same token, it is faster and
> cheaper for someone to extract information about channel capacities on
> the network with a binary search.
>
>
> -jimpo
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
š Original message:
.... and any thoughts on protections against flood pinging?
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 09:45 -0500, Jim Posen wrote:
> The main benefit is that this should make it quicker to send a
> successful payment because latency is lower than sending an actual
> payment and the sender could ping all possible routes in parallel,
> whereas they can't send multiple payments in parallel. The main
> downside I can think of is that, by the same token, it is faster and
> cheaper for someone to extract information about channel capacities on
> the network with a binary search.
>
>
> -jimpo
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev