Event JSON
{
"id": "60cd54655ed86dc838a6563c6970109e9393e9c7ff1360c3f166cded079a2fa5",
"pubkey": "7f4e42de43fe692e75e3573324ad9e1c987d326a627a03a4edc60b9fac81c5b1",
"created_at": 1699905088,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f1c6c5c3fb8809601f84a753072faa00a81b17ab91a190dd7531fed6b6100eac",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"6f9089e5e6810f9514a501f04b94466f7473f4db7fb0e9e389966dc7cfb76251",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"b295234dd64b374c6a9acfa6954792929a9e09fe67228cfcbffdda775e245c3f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/JMarkOckerbloom/statuses/111404979864591145",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub178rvtslm3qykq8uy5afswta2qz5pk9atjxsepht4x8ldddssp6kq4sqekt Interesting. The code for lower courts uses \"should\" more than \"shall\", but it does use \"shall\" at some key points, including the policy for recusal. (The Supreme Court's code has a similar section on recusal but uses \"should\" in place of \"shall\" at the start)",
"sig": "f66a646b2932dd4a216a00a4f735bfef83a77322d0808aa8adcbf1dd2331e87690333f4cbaa096f0512001f24ae42fa689325034fb5a1a1170e625241cfc02e2"
}