Anarthlic on Nostr: More danger ahead in pink: The worldly media was canonized to be liked to the Gospel ...
More danger ahead in pink: The worldly media was canonized to be liked to the Gospel and proclaimed to have an "ecclesiastical dimension", "based on the Trinitarian connection"--and that "it is a perfect exemplar of communication leading to unity." Based on the previous pages--they speak of universal values and a brotherhood and fraternity, with the Trinitarian God as a mere mention but oft obscured by so many other things, one needs to wade through so many equivocal and ambiguous terms to determine what they really mean.
How many people have the time to make this out? How many are phlegmatic enough (as St. Thomas Aquinas was) with the right formation to not allow this to spill over onto a different plane and find themselves Cartesian and Kantian? And what of entropy, given time is such a scarce resource?
One again, it resembles the "occasion of sin" framework.
An additional note on the media having an “ecclesiastical dimension”—they are like priests now, eh? Vatican II apologists will quip: That’s not what they mean. You mean what you say and say what you mean. Enough with the anthropocentric adventures that only accelerate entropy and lead to confusion—misleading souls in the process. Of course, each soul is ultimately responsible. But why invite that soul to the fringes of interpretation?
How many people have the time to make this out? How many are phlegmatic enough (as St. Thomas Aquinas was) with the right formation to not allow this to spill over onto a different plane and find themselves Cartesian and Kantian? And what of entropy, given time is such a scarce resource?
One again, it resembles the "occasion of sin" framework.
An additional note on the media having an “ecclesiastical dimension”—they are like priests now, eh? Vatican II apologists will quip: That’s not what they mean. You mean what you say and say what you mean. Enough with the anthropocentric adventures that only accelerate entropy and lead to confusion—misleading souls in the process. Of course, each soul is ultimately responsible. But why invite that soul to the fringes of interpretation?