Sarah Burstein on Nostr: Now, courts are only supposed to admit experts whose "scientific, technical, or other ...
Now, courts are only supposed to admit experts whose "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702I am struggling to understand how an entomologist is better-situated than the average juror to decide how things look.
Published at
2023-07-07 12:24:21Event JSON
{
"id": "60c4da1f3d5cfb18ace15588fa832d8ebf11c48576ef72feec5e085d42ff6bd7",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1688732661,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"67f7e2ee138054a627e24eb86d9556f4e046a078105820ca0db6c0aec71b514f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/110672783677997082"
]
],
"content": "Now, courts are only supposed to admit experts whose \"scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.\"\n\nhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702\n\nI am struggling to understand how an entomologist is better-situated than the average juror to decide how things look.",
"sig": "7c537ee333642fb15655dcea50d9d9185112f71cf4225fd00268234e8f97bac64fab9f1927b8b9706b9799c618aaada912aac926bdf936de4d31542acaf414fa"
}
