hajisatoshi on Nostr: He's an African American. I am NOT. But I understand his perspective. I agree 100% ...
He's an African American. I am NOT. But I understand his perspective. I agree 100% and not because I heard it from "black" man.
Let me tell you an interesting story. I had a discussion with a colleague at work (European dissent, more specifically British) about racism and how the term was created to neuter "white" people. I explained to him that a "white" man, in our current zeitgeist, is not allowed to take offense to bad culture that comes from people that don't look like them for fear of being called a racist. I explained to him that this was a real problem and no amount of order or stability was worth accepting this. I continued to say how is a man able to protect his women and children if he's told that he is not allowed to discriminate good culture from bad. For context, this guy is probably in his late 50s, early 60s. He listened to me as I explained but after a few minutes his eyes started to look as if he was defeated and he quickly proceeded to say let's stop this before someone calls HR on us. What I gathered is there's a latent feeling of resent and anger for our currently forced multiculturalism in most white people but most are passive about it. Their wives and children are uncontrollable and as a man, you are left with little meaning in life if you cannot be a leader and protecter.
I may not use the word "racist" anymore because of how you showed me it plays into globalist, Marxist agendas. Trust me, my outlook is 180° out of phase with theirs. Private property and lineage are primary pillars to a civilized society. Without private property though, you cannot protect lineage properly which is why we see people "settling" for less, ie as Muhammad Ali was saying "sic...I prefer a black american over black African and much more than a white women because she understands me".
Thank you for the response. I was underwhelmed by your response on my last post to you but I have a better understanding of your arguments.
Peace to you. ✌🏾
Let me tell you an interesting story. I had a discussion with a colleague at work (European dissent, more specifically British) about racism and how the term was created to neuter "white" people. I explained to him that a "white" man, in our current zeitgeist, is not allowed to take offense to bad culture that comes from people that don't look like them for fear of being called a racist. I explained to him that this was a real problem and no amount of order or stability was worth accepting this. I continued to say how is a man able to protect his women and children if he's told that he is not allowed to discriminate good culture from bad. For context, this guy is probably in his late 50s, early 60s. He listened to me as I explained but after a few minutes his eyes started to look as if he was defeated and he quickly proceeded to say let's stop this before someone calls HR on us. What I gathered is there's a latent feeling of resent and anger for our currently forced multiculturalism in most white people but most are passive about it. Their wives and children are uncontrollable and as a man, you are left with little meaning in life if you cannot be a leader and protecter.
I may not use the word "racist" anymore because of how you showed me it plays into globalist, Marxist agendas. Trust me, my outlook is 180° out of phase with theirs. Private property and lineage are primary pillars to a civilized society. Without private property though, you cannot protect lineage properly which is why we see people "settling" for less, ie as Muhammad Ali was saying "sic...I prefer a black american over black African and much more than a white women because she understands me".
Thank you for the response. I was underwhelmed by your response on my last post to you but I have a better understanding of your arguments.
Peace to you. ✌🏾