Event JSON
{
"id": "69fb204de729f1c9d1b0943bb09a9f04c24f072a216238b5d0bc645e69376365",
"pubkey": "83515628d8295fd20dd441250c982aa6cabaf752db7bb74d4640814fba0e658f",
"created_at": 1694536215,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0bdc49ebd86971b3bd92d3614c0c3085208f6a41fb22a66b7354602464dc890c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"eddababc906fdb7a0d1c75ae227442a9e64932f51f0d19ca245e311481f9c461",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"867564526f3e4048e4491f19a900a2a709c6026eacf1de1c0f2d4e040fa93578",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://sfba.social/users/skydog/statuses/111053125386716895",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1p0wyn67cd9cm80vj6ds5crpss5sg76jplv32v6mn23szgexu3yxqq822r5 \n\nIs not \"the duty to sit\" a strong argument for expanding the Court significantly, to give remedy by providing alternate jurists to cover recusals?",
"sig": "60f951bf1a02303a1f2c7f2c45eb085e88f40e0da1a27b15e458f06101a7ca97ba460d451a1c64a284a1b5b0992e4455c899a32c51547775e6789d03409d8414"
}
