Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-10-26 📝 Original message:As there has been some ...

📅 Original date posted:2022-10-26
📝 Original message:As there has been some feedback to the same effect, I've opened a competing
PR for separate evaluation here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26398

Please give feedback if anyone has any.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:07:54PM -0400, Greg Sanders wrote:
> > I don't doubt the use case(it's why I opened the issue!). I didn't want
> the
> > proposal to die in case people found it odd that 61, 62, 63, but not 64
> > bytes ended up being broadcast able.
> >
> > Perhaps this is not an issue, especially since this isn't a consensus
> > change like the Great Consensus Cleanup. Willing to change my proposal
> and
> > PR if people have no strong objections.
>
> I think it's fine if we only restrict 64 bytes. We have a specific reason
> to do
> that and it's ok if we just tell people that. Only fairly-technical
> use-cases
> are affected anyway.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221026/a50dab98/attachment.html>;