Fir :transspecies star: on Nostr: Sofia m o μ s e Sexual liberation doesn't necessarily mean having sex with whomever ...
Sofia (npub1qxx…u6la) m o μ s e (npub19kn…0fes) Sexual liberation doesn't necessarily mean having sex with whomever you wish, it entails being able to express yourself sexually and not be punished for your expression of sexuality. Preventing adults from engaging in sexual acts with youths does not inhibit youth's sexual expression. As I said aoc and cp/sam prohibition abolition are possible consequences of removal of power imbalances and sexual liberation but not a requirement.
There isn't any information currently available showing that even with the maximum amount of youth liberation possible before physiological/psychological differences become the issue, abolition of the AOC would be beneficial to youths.
I could see a reduction of the AOC in current society, though the age of majority prevents that, imo.
Your view of youth liberation is very AAM/MAP centric, if you'd not mind I'd like to take you into an abstraction for a moment, imagine a world without AAMs, in what way would removal of the AOC be beneficial to youths in the way that other parts of what you consider to be youth liberation be? Consider the negatives on youths? There really isn't anything positive that would come from this, there would be only neutral and negative results. And, while we don't live in that world, this can help in understanding that removal of the AOC is not a necessity to youthlib, but rather a pro-c MAP/AAM position that needs youth lib to come to fruition. While Youthlib is about liberation of all youths, it is about doing so in a way that would most benefit the most youths, as it is impossible to have full 100% liberation for everyone, certain liberties for some infringe on liberties for others.
There isn't any information currently available showing that even with the maximum amount of youth liberation possible before physiological/psychological differences become the issue, abolition of the AOC would be beneficial to youths.
I could see a reduction of the AOC in current society, though the age of majority prevents that, imo.
Your view of youth liberation is very AAM/MAP centric, if you'd not mind I'd like to take you into an abstraction for a moment, imagine a world without AAMs, in what way would removal of the AOC be beneficial to youths in the way that other parts of what you consider to be youth liberation be? Consider the negatives on youths? There really isn't anything positive that would come from this, there would be only neutral and negative results. And, while we don't live in that world, this can help in understanding that removal of the AOC is not a necessity to youthlib, but rather a pro-c MAP/AAM position that needs youth lib to come to fruition. While Youthlib is about liberation of all youths, it is about doing so in a way that would most benefit the most youths, as it is impossible to have full 100% liberation for everyone, certain liberties for some infringe on liberties for others.