pippellia on Nostr: Super interesting comments. > Crossing mints means more complexity and trust issues ...
Super interesting comments.
> Crossing mints means more complexity and trust issues maybe? But again, you can imagine niches where it might be ideal.
calle 👁️⚡👁️ (nprofile…h5zr) some time ago shared the "multi nut payment" or some other silly 🥜 name :)
The idea is that you can have your wealth spread across 1000s of mints, while still being able to pay a single lightning invoice. Just wanted to share that in case u didn't know.
Another very practical observation on the limit of the privacy of your scheme (which, don't get me wrong I find really interesting):
The person has to own an UTXO. Not many people today own an UTXO, so the anonset is already much smaller than the whole world. And for the future, well that'll probably remain small because of the onchain fees.
> Crossing mints means more complexity and trust issues maybe? But again, you can imagine niches where it might be ideal.
calle 👁️⚡👁️ (nprofile…h5zr) some time ago shared the "multi nut payment" or some other silly 🥜 name :)
The idea is that you can have your wealth spread across 1000s of mints, while still being able to pay a single lightning invoice. Just wanted to share that in case u didn't know.
Another very practical observation on the limit of the privacy of your scheme (which, don't get me wrong I find really interesting):
The person has to own an UTXO. Not many people today own an UTXO, so the anonset is already much smaller than the whole world. And for the future, well that'll probably remain small because of the onchain fees.