{ "id": "69688c4e247d1b874a8238af4bd8fde2898c493f5b5ae3a0bd6703def2ae23f4", "pubkey": "6a02b7d5d5c1ceec3d0ad28dd71c4cfeebb6397b95fef5cd5032c9223a13d02a", "created_at": 1732338120, "kind": 9802, "tags": [ [ "r", "https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/", "source" ], [ "comment", "Build a temple from its solid foundation" ] ], "content": "Conclusions\nBluesky is built by good people who care, and it is providing something that people desperately want and need. If you are looking for a Twitter replacement, you can find it in Bluesky today.\n\nHowever, I stand by my assertions that Bluesky is not meaningfully decentralized and that it is certainly not federated according to any technical definition of federation we have had in a decentralized social network context previously. To claim that Bluesky is decentralized or federated in its current form moves the goalposts of both of those terms, which I find unacceptable.\n\nHowever, \"credible exit\" is a reasonable term to describe what Bluesky is aiming for. It is Bluesky's term, and I think Bluesky should embrace that term fully in all contexts and work that they can.\n\n", "sig": "60df00275b56fafb75f7b7398a3f31ee72b0f8e68459913e3723e61dfed8e7eeca6a256ac320f5415759f2431d022afd6a60e4a4bd8078c17bee88798a4fb714" }