Farley on Nostr: Watching a show on TV named: "Banned from the Bible Part 2... The idea of "banning" ...
Watching a show on TV named: "Banned from the Bible Part 2...
The idea of "banning" texts from the Bible reeks of human intervention, not divine decree. If something is truly sacred, why would it need to be censored, hidden, or removed? That’s the work of institutions and authorities seeking control, deciding what’s “official” and what isn’t, shaping narratives to serve their own purposes.
A truly divine force wouldn’t need gatekeepers—truth stands on its own. It’s fascinating how many ancient writings were dismissed, not because they lacked wisdom, but because they didn’t fit the desired narrative. Sounds a lot like fiat currency and central banking, doesn’t it? Controlling the flow of what people believe, just like controlling the flow of money.
The idea of "banning" texts from the Bible reeks of human intervention, not divine decree. If something is truly sacred, why would it need to be censored, hidden, or removed? That’s the work of institutions and authorities seeking control, deciding what’s “official” and what isn’t, shaping narratives to serve their own purposes.
A truly divine force wouldn’t need gatekeepers—truth stands on its own. It’s fascinating how many ancient writings were dismissed, not because they lacked wisdom, but because they didn’t fit the desired narrative. Sounds a lot like fiat currency and central banking, doesn’t it? Controlling the flow of what people believe, just like controlling the flow of money.