Carl Graham on Nostr: Arguing over to what extent Bragg can cross-examine Trump, if he testifies, about ...
Arguing over to what extent Bragg can cross-examine Trump, if he testifies, about prior court rulings is a purely academic exercise, and a pointless one at that.
Despite his bluster, the chances of Trump testifying in his criminal case are zero. Not merely vanishingly small, but completely and utterly nil.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4600918-bragg-wants-to-cross-examine-trump-on-civil-cases-in-hush-money-trial/
Despite his bluster, the chances of Trump testifying in his criminal case are zero. Not merely vanishingly small, but completely and utterly nil.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4600918-bragg-wants-to-cross-examine-trump-on-civil-cases-in-hush-money-trial/