npub1zl…22n8p on Nostr: I'd wager a decent percentage of OG Bitcoin devs feel this way. Bitcoin development ...
I'd wager a decent percentage of OG Bitcoin devs feel this way. Bitcoin development is very slow and methodical. Each decision is analyzed and debated thoroughly for years pre-soft fork.
Nostr development is the wild west with limited analysis and debate pre NIP merge. I'm not done analyzing the protocol fully yet (only the major kinds and as of late last night.. mostly all the tags), but there is certainly more protocol-level technical debt is more than I thought there would be.
There are pros and cons to each approach. What would be called bike shedding here would be called due process there. Probably somewhere in the middle is more ideal as stagnation is unacceptable, but at the same time I am nervous about Nostr protocol-level technical debt amd think we need to slow down a little bit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handover
Nostr development is the wild west with limited analysis and debate pre NIP merge. I'm not done analyzing the protocol fully yet (only the major kinds and as of late last night.. mostly all the tags), but there is certainly more protocol-level technical debt is more than I thought there would be.
There are pros and cons to each approach. What would be called bike shedding here would be called due process there. Probably somewhere in the middle is more ideal as stagnation is unacceptable, but at the same time I am nervous about Nostr protocol-level technical debt amd think we need to slow down a little bit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handover