Event JSON
{
"id": "64910fe6443714d685159b5312c0852276a0973e6f88797ae64900f49213209e",
"pubkey": "770280147157bdd557a2123e1807d12693b7dfd4a9ff82a0d4fb7adcd1058a3e",
"created_at": 1709308066,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0b494d8345407787f42b791a4a6d3f7dd51a2af45798a51636435cf86eaae5e4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"58319fe1e93e75d18ca28a3b7cc43a21b7fb044f3641a9527da51f7033e4efa7",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"46011e75ff9c3980d8f7fced16b4d2137f5dc5ed929847b915adbfabc90e1877",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/Radical_EgoCom/statuses/112021213475019874",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1pdy5mq69gpmc0apt0ydy5mfl0h2352h527v2293kgdw0sm42uhjq9ujm0h Yes, circular reasoning is indeed a formal logical fallacy. It occurs when the conclusion of an argument is included in the premises, essentially assuming what one is trying to prove.",
"sig": "7dafaf202b9fe50352648bc05be9b885fbc630d7907c9e236bb47062d90225e4d39b19a7ae127451e45a556425f1d743caa680097b481a6df1a175e27b4a3090"
}
