Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-09-02 📝 Original message:On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-09-02
📝 Original message:On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1.
>
This fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together?
Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently?
📝 Original message:On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1.
>
This fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together?
Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently?