Event JSON
{
"id": "6c885f719c4ea4230088b5e4c01f442975297c712324b4c2f16c1a5dd7f9e900",
"pubkey": "48208ce6ed49a196d88d90a06e5fce17907d057e4d8966b0fb62a34b8f033298",
"created_at": 1704323941,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ed70906254c00a0ef3821462300351b71b3e6ade35539a9b212c61eff29745a3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"0ecb1c9b6fc91390ab51a5a39082f44c4abe0a19ad67c63b709d175ebf23e0f2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"2e095e560b2d7f442870947a65f719aeb73ab2c6ff63aa4852831b480d35210c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://ioc.exchange/users/againsthimself/statuses/111694573810510880",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1a4cfqcj5cq9qauuzz33rqq63kudnu6k7x4fe4xep93s7lu5hgk3szqt2kf I'd argue that obsolescence is different from non-durability (your original question). The former is a function of the rate of innovation in future products, while the latter is a property of the manufactured product in hand. Both properties are interesting, but should probably be considered separately.",
"sig": "d8f860a45dd7caa247baf755b5f910f46d1bebe5e487da2d03cc1e608805ba15659da863a630b5534445255b0c3c9cc9ea1f2c3071b834fff493e613bf3283fe"
}
