Sylwia 🏳️⚧️ :nyarch: on Nostr: This movie is outrageous considering that black people were blamed for "breeding too ...
This movie is outrageous considering that black people were blamed for "breeding too fast and it should be ended with genocide or eugenics" also there was a tendency to say that black people are less intelligent than whites or culturally deficient ergo slavery and segregation is ok like craniometry and genetic IQ bullshit were employed to prove this "fact" Jensen, Warren, Pioneer Fund, Mankind Quarterly all had a very keen interest in "ending impossible equity programs" or "proving desegregation is harmful"
These IQ truthers think that IQ determines your social class, wages and race this is the main point of The Bell Curve. Nowadays these freaks congrate in "biodiversity" and "race realist" spaces which is a modern version of scientific racism there is a whole branch of neo-facists metapolitics of making "redpills" to recruit new people into the movement or debate onlookers they have a site with "IQ classics" like Jensen, Warren, Lynn (not to be confused with Flynn who argued that there is a Flynn effect an increase of IQ in time therefore IQ is not genetic) who manipulated IQ scores to make them 60 for Africa and argues that poverty of Africa is due to low IQ oh yeah ofc we are so back to 19th century if you ignore colonialism and neo-colonialism extraction which is the same shit Peterson is arguing! Faszole jebane no. Literally the same shit that was used to justify apartheid. When the Mismeasure of Man Dropped it basically debunked the bell curve.
"Columnist Bob Herbert, writing for The New York Times, described the book as "a scabrous piece of racial pornography masquerading as serious scholarship". "Mr. Murray can protest all he wants", wrote Herbert; "his book is just a genteel way of calling somebody a nigger."
"Some scientists have disputed the value of IQ as a measure of intelligence altogether. In The Mismeasure of Man (1981, expanded edition 1996), evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould compared IQ testing with the now-discredited practice of determining intelligence via craniometry, arguing that both are based on the fallacy of reification, "our tendency to convert abstract concepts into entities".
IQ harms minorities, it harma school children. Mass IQ testing brought nothing good to the world. We need a new theory of intelligence that doesn't pretend to be an objective thing categorizing minds into a hierarchy of value with a million biases. Success is not due to your own mind it is basically depend if society lets you use your full potential or supports you if you lack something under social model of disability. Therefore I don't think IQ is "flawed but valid" psychologists should find a better theory and it is not like they can't be wrong they thought I'm a disorder until very recently.
https://bolesblogs.com/1998/03/23/a-review-of-the-bell-curve-bad-science-makes-for-bad-conclusions/||
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909835/
.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man
These IQ truthers think that IQ determines your social class, wages and race this is the main point of The Bell Curve. Nowadays these freaks congrate in "biodiversity" and "race realist" spaces which is a modern version of scientific racism there is a whole branch of neo-facists metapolitics of making "redpills" to recruit new people into the movement or debate onlookers they have a site with "IQ classics" like Jensen, Warren, Lynn (not to be confused with Flynn who argued that there is a Flynn effect an increase of IQ in time therefore IQ is not genetic) who manipulated IQ scores to make them 60 for Africa and argues that poverty of Africa is due to low IQ oh yeah ofc we are so back to 19th century if you ignore colonialism and neo-colonialism extraction which is the same shit Peterson is arguing! Faszole jebane no. Literally the same shit that was used to justify apartheid. When the Mismeasure of Man Dropped it basically debunked the bell curve.
"Columnist Bob Herbert, writing for The New York Times, described the book as "a scabrous piece of racial pornography masquerading as serious scholarship". "Mr. Murray can protest all he wants", wrote Herbert; "his book is just a genteel way of calling somebody a nigger."
"Some scientists have disputed the value of IQ as a measure of intelligence altogether. In The Mismeasure of Man (1981, expanded edition 1996), evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould compared IQ testing with the now-discredited practice of determining intelligence via craniometry, arguing that both are based on the fallacy of reification, "our tendency to convert abstract concepts into entities".
IQ harms minorities, it harma school children. Mass IQ testing brought nothing good to the world. We need a new theory of intelligence that doesn't pretend to be an objective thing categorizing minds into a hierarchy of value with a million biases. Success is not due to your own mind it is basically depend if society lets you use your full potential or supports you if you lack something under social model of disability. Therefore I don't think IQ is "flawed but valid" psychologists should find a better theory and it is not like they can't be wrong they thought I'm a disorder until very recently.
https://bolesblogs.com/1998/03/23/a-review-of-the-bell-curve-bad-science-makes-for-bad-conclusions/||
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909835/
.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man