Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-03-11 š Original message:On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at ...
š
Original date posted:2014-03-11
š Original message:On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:13:48AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Sure, but I don't see wallets being able to _assume_ _remote_ parties
> have an HD wallet for a long, long time. Interoperability common
> sense implies the environment will be heterogenous, perhaps forever,
> invalidating assume-each-party-uses-HD logic.
Maybe never: you can implement a wallet that uses stealth addresses for
change, and doing appears to be advantageous in some scenarious with
regard to privacy.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000a636d318d7384d2891c788af10e50b8d1e27b64df847f9117b
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 685 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140311/cb72c940/attachment.sig>;
š Original message:On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:13:48AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Sure, but I don't see wallets being able to _assume_ _remote_ parties
> have an HD wallet for a long, long time. Interoperability common
> sense implies the environment will be heterogenous, perhaps forever,
> invalidating assume-each-party-uses-HD logic.
Maybe never: you can implement a wallet that uses stealth addresses for
change, and doing appears to be advantageous in some scenarious with
regard to privacy.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000a636d318d7384d2891c788af10e50b8d1e27b64df847f9117b
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 685 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140311/cb72c940/attachment.sig>;