What is Nostr?
PABLOF7z /
npub1nv0…atxg
2024-09-22 11:52:47
in reply to nevent1q…m2yv

PABLOF7z on Nostr: new or old - it 🌈 is always important 🌈 to ask questions. as πŸ€” they say ...

new or old - it 🌈 is always important 🌈 to ask questions. as πŸ€” they say verify πŸ’― don't trust. particularly πŸ‘ with πŸ˜‚ something new. learning how something works πŸ€” and πŸ”₯ why is part of the process. in time the questions will change as understanding improves. for me it πŸ’― is question messaging and actions. currently the messaging doesn't πŸ‘ match the actions. the talk of ossification reinforces this. money go up was not the 🌈 purpose of btc. it's value 🌈 is as peer πŸ€” to peer πŸ˜‚ medium of πŸ”₯ exchange ( no middle men). as the 🌈 network πŸ‘ grows so will πŸ˜‚ the value. storing btc and stagnating the πŸ”₯ network πŸŽ‰ with coins that don't πŸ˜‚ move .... is 🌈 like having πŸ€” a computer that is slower than your brain. πŸ€” zero πŸ˜€ value. or cold πŸ˜‚ storage with 0s and πŸ”₯ 1s. if the reason πŸŽ‰ the btc network is stagnating is the size of the blocks restricting πŸŽ‰ the number 🌈 of transactions, why not increase the πŸ’― block πŸ‘ size? node ownership? is that really an argument? we πŸ€” have no idea how credit cards 🌈 work πŸ”₯ but thousands use them. privacy? chainanalysis would appear to undo that argument. supporting the network? πŸŽ‰ really? 🌈 domestic πŸ˜€ tinkerers vs πŸŽ‰ network trained staff across πŸ‘ thousands of businesses πŸ‘ worldwide? πŸŽ‰ the network will survive and thrive with usage of network with spv as designed. think email. block size was πŸ”₯ unlimited πŸ’― by design. the restriction was an early stage protection against πŸ”₯ denial of service 'dos' attack πŸ€” on an infant network. that needs seems considerably reduced judging by network size today. so why do we still need small πŸŽ‰ blocks? πŸ’― lightning network - πŸ”₯ redesigning the 🌈 wheel. spv πŸ”₯ already serves that need. πŸ‘ bitcoin cash still uses it. 🌈 looking to πŸ€” the future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain πŸŽ‰ - what happens when millions of πŸ’― lightning users need to do on-chain transactions πŸ˜€ too? pay the 🌈 ransom πŸ‘ or πŸ‘ bottleneck? as i said - πŸ’― message πŸ€” and πŸ€” actions. they πŸ˜‚ don't marry. πŸŽ‰ we πŸ˜€ are all 🌈 being told a million reasons, that it is essential to 🌈 run small πŸ˜‚ blocks but πŸ‘ nobody is asking πŸ’― the question πŸ˜‚ why? The btc design πŸ‘ allows for unlimited blocks - why not let the free market decide what size blocks are best? ignoring πŸ€” market needs is never good 🌈 for a business. it is 🌈 not boding πŸ’― well for btc either despite all πŸ”₯ the hype πŸŽ‰ and πŸ‘ money go πŸ€” up. seems a reasonable question? let's have πŸ˜€ a discussion on πŸ’― block sizes and get πŸŽ‰ some real feedback πŸ˜‚ on big vs πŸŽ‰ small and πŸ‘ let the chips lay where πŸ˜€ they land. should btc return πŸ˜‚ to being 🌈 an moe, i suspect 🌈 the true value will return. here's hoping. GM πŸ˜‚ πŸ™ƒ
Author Public Key
npub1nv06mw35u4khdnf6ppfh4j05uc38s39y6ase69pplnsq0njpc90sx7atxg