AgrarianContrarian on Nostr: The IPCC models on climate change still view the sun's impact as a constant, yet we ...
The IPCC models on climate change still view the sun's impact as a constant, yet we have proven scientific data that says this is not the case. One such example is the sun's approximate 11 year sunspot cycle. The sun also has many much longer cycles that impact temperature, intensity, etc.
Why does the IPCC use constants when the evidence has been proven otherwise? Because it doesn't fit the narrative they are being used by global elites to pedal.
That giant ball of intense heat in the sky is why we have any life on Earth. We should probably pay more attention to that and be less self-centered thinking we are more capable than we likely are at heating an entire planet. Take the power away from "authority" and DYOR.
Why does the IPCC use constants when the evidence has been proven otherwise? Because it doesn't fit the narrative they are being used by global elites to pedal.
That giant ball of intense heat in the sky is why we have any life on Earth. We should probably pay more attention to that and be less self-centered thinking we are more capable than we likely are at heating an entire planet. Take the power away from "authority" and DYOR.