Ako Suminoe :njp: on Nostr: >Again, this is based on "estimates" and "adjustments" from the same people who told ...
>Again, this is based on "estimates" and "adjustments" from the same people who told us our cities would be underwater by the year 2000. And before that they were predicting global famines, peak oil, a new ice age etc.
There's a difference between estimating where carbon came from and estimating the change in global temperature as a result of that carbon change. There's also a difference between the predictions made by actual scientific bodies and anti-White activists that are trying to destroy our countries. Again, I don't expect you to understand this.
>The theory that CO2 drives climate change is very much an unproven one. If anything the evidence suggests it's the other way around.
The theory is that there are a bunch of things that impact climate, with atmospheric composition being one of them. It's pretty damn settled, so I'd take anyone saying that the relationship is inverse with a grain of salt. Remember that you've already been caught misinterpreting trivial data to score online points, only to cry that the data was probably fake to save face.
>I used to be a climate cultist too, you'll outgrow it eventually. Good luck.
I used to be a climate change denier, too. I eventually outgrew that.
There's a difference between estimating where carbon came from and estimating the change in global temperature as a result of that carbon change. There's also a difference between the predictions made by actual scientific bodies and anti-White activists that are trying to destroy our countries. Again, I don't expect you to understand this.
>The theory that CO2 drives climate change is very much an unproven one. If anything the evidence suggests it's the other way around.
The theory is that there are a bunch of things that impact climate, with atmospheric composition being one of them. It's pretty damn settled, so I'd take anyone saying that the relationship is inverse with a grain of salt. Remember that you've already been caught misinterpreting trivial data to score online points, only to cry that the data was probably fake to save face.
>I used to be a climate cultist too, you'll outgrow it eventually. Good luck.
I used to be a climate change denier, too. I eventually outgrew that.