tschenkel on Nostr: npub1l0s7u…lpgrv From that link you shared: "Economists have claimed, in refereed ...
npub1l0s7uss5hmjvwmzqyq4klw0ku6g6a6nj9qcxlk9yg8p9rtr9k4esjlpgrv (npub1l0s…pgrv)
From that link you shared:
"Economists have claimed, in refereed economics papers, that 6°C of global warming will reduce future global GDP by less than 10%, compared to what GDP would have been in the complete absence of climate change."
and
"In contrast, scientists have claimed, in refereed science papers, that 5°C of global warming implies damages that are “beyond catastrophic, including existential threats,” while even 1°C of warming—which we have already passed—could trigger dangerous climate tipping points."
Where do the economists get their climate impact numbers from to arrive at such an optimistic claim? Not from the science papers?
From that link you shared:
"Economists have claimed, in refereed economics papers, that 6°C of global warming will reduce future global GDP by less than 10%, compared to what GDP would have been in the complete absence of climate change."
and
"In contrast, scientists have claimed, in refereed science papers, that 5°C of global warming implies damages that are “beyond catastrophic, including existential threats,” while even 1°C of warming—which we have already passed—could trigger dangerous climate tipping points."
Where do the economists get their climate impact numbers from to arrive at such an optimistic claim? Not from the science papers?