Nobstirtonic on Nostr: Everything published related to Bitcoin inheritance planning that comes up online ...
Everything published related to Bitcoin inheritance planning that comes up online with a simple search is anti sovereign Bitcoiner. They all introduce multiple third-party intermediaries and focuses on working "within the existing legal framework". I get that most of this is coming from legacy financial advisors and "coordinators" of multi-sig services but it is still disappointing.
We have this amazing thing called Bitcoin that we can each individually utilize to regain some semblance of sovereignty, but it seems like even some self proclaimed Bitcoin only types are missing the opportunity to emphasize the mind blowing elements of the sovereignty available within the topic of "inheritance planning".
Is it as simple (and stupid) as it's hard to monitize helping people become more sovereign? Is it KYC complications combined with a focus on "mass adoption"? Is it just a warped risk assessment (focusing on consequences versus probability) which makes it so personal that you have to arrive at it alone?
Why do you think this is?
We have this amazing thing called Bitcoin that we can each individually utilize to regain some semblance of sovereignty, but it seems like even some self proclaimed Bitcoin only types are missing the opportunity to emphasize the mind blowing elements of the sovereignty available within the topic of "inheritance planning".
Is it as simple (and stupid) as it's hard to monitize helping people become more sovereign? Is it KYC complications combined with a focus on "mass adoption"? Is it just a warped risk assessment (focusing on consequences versus probability) which makes it so personal that you have to arrive at it alone?
Why do you think this is?