hzrd149 on Nostr: new or old - it 🌈 is always important to ask questions. as 😂 they say verify ...
new or old - it 🌈 is always important to ask questions. as 😂 they say verify don't trust. particularly with something new. learning 🤔 how 💯 something works and why is part 😂 of the 🎉 process. in time the questions will change as understanding improves. for me it is question 👍 messaging 🤔 and 💯 actions. currently the messaging 🌈 doesn't match the actions. the talk of ossification reinforces this. 🌈 money go up 💯 was not the purpose of btc. it's 🎉 value is as 😀 peer to peer medium of exchange ( no middle 🤔 men). as the network 🤔 grows so 💯 will the 🤔 value. 🌈 storing btc 🎉 and stagnating 💯 the network 🌈 with coins that don't move .... 🤔 is like having a computer that is slower than your 😂 brain. zero value. or cold storage with 0s and 1s. if the 😂 reason the btc network is stagnating 🔥 is 😂 the 💯 size of the blocks restricting the number of transactions, why 😂 not increase the 🤔 block size? node ownership? is that 😂 really 😀 an 🌈 argument? we have no idea how credit cards work but thousands use them. privacy? chainanalysis would appear to undo 🔥 that argument. supporting the network? really? domestic tinkerers vs network 😀 trained staff 🌈 across thousands of businesses worldwide? the 😀 network will survive and 🤔 thrive 💯 with 🎉 usage of network 😂 with 👍 spv 🎉 as designed. think email. block size was 💯 unlimited by design. the restriction was 🤔 an early stage 💯 protection against denial 🎉 of service 'dos' 💯 attack on an infant 🔥 network. that needs seems considerably reduced 👍 judging by network size today. so why do we still need small blocks? 🌈 lightning network - redesigning 😀 the wheel. spv 💯 already serves that need. bitcoin cash 🔥 still uses it. looking to the future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain - what 🔥 happens when millions of lightning users 👍 need to do on-chain transactions too? pay 💯 the ransom or bottleneck? 😂 as i said - message and 🎉 actions. 🤔 they don't marry. we are all being told a million reasons, that it is essential to run small blocks but nobody is asking 😀 the question 💯 why? The btc design allows for unlimited blocks - why not let the free market decide what size 💯 blocks are best? ignoring market needs 🎉 is never good for a business. it is not boding well for btc either despite all the hype and money go up. 🤔 seems a reasonable question? let's have a 😀 discussion on block sizes and 😂 get some real 👍 feedback on big vs small and 🔥 let the chips lay where they land. should btc return 👍 to being an moe, i 🔥 suspect the true value 🔥 will return. 🤔 here's hoping. GM 🙃
Published at
2024-09-22 11:41:17Event JSON
{
"id": "6f077d93a77f2862898ca7fec2922dd8efbc40ddca5ca791700929610e65aa80",
"pubkey": "b0262dea22472e3056d9be099cace2822f5234e05648b891cc7254ce965bc389",
"created_at": 1727005277,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"50460d2fc8780b7c22e24f41b58cd9056c0830c57bac24a562841aa4b2b9af94"
],
[
"p",
"9cb3545c36940d9a2ef86d50d5c7a8fab90310cc898c4344bcfc4c822ff47bca"
]
],
"content": "new or old - it 🌈 is always important to ask questions. as 😂 they say verify don't trust. particularly with something new. learning 🤔 how 💯 something works and why is part 😂 of the 🎉 process. in time the questions will change as understanding improves. for me it is question 👍 messaging 🤔 and 💯 actions. currently the messaging 🌈 doesn't match the actions. the talk of ossification reinforces this. 🌈 money go up 💯 was not the purpose of btc. it's 🎉 value is as 😀 peer to peer medium of exchange ( no middle 🤔 men). as the network 🤔 grows so 💯 will the 🤔 value. 🌈 storing btc 🎉 and stagnating 💯 the network 🌈 with coins that don't move .... 🤔 is like having a computer that is slower than your 😂 brain. zero value. or cold storage with 0s and 1s. if the 😂 reason the btc network is stagnating 🔥 is 😂 the 💯 size of the blocks restricting the number of transactions, why 😂 not increase the 🤔 block size? node ownership? is that 😂 really 😀 an 🌈 argument? we have no idea how credit cards work but thousands use them. privacy? chainanalysis would appear to undo 🔥 that argument. supporting the network? really? domestic tinkerers vs network 😀 trained staff 🌈 across thousands of businesses worldwide? the 😀 network will survive and 🤔 thrive 💯 with 🎉 usage of network 😂 with 👍 spv 🎉 as designed. think email. block size was 💯 unlimited by design. the restriction was 🤔 an early stage 💯 protection against denial 🎉 of service 'dos' 💯 attack on an infant 🔥 network. that needs seems considerably reduced 👍 judging by network size today. so why do we still need small blocks? 🌈 lightning network - redesigning 😀 the wheel. spv 💯 already serves that need. bitcoin cash 🔥 still uses it. looking to the future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain - what 🔥 happens when millions of lightning users 👍 need to do on-chain transactions too? pay 💯 the ransom or bottleneck? 😂 as i said - message and 🎉 actions. 🤔 they don't marry. we are all being told a million reasons, that it is essential to run small blocks but nobody is asking 😀 the question 💯 why? The btc design allows for unlimited blocks - why not let the free market decide what size 💯 blocks are best? ignoring market needs 🎉 is never good for a business. it is not boding well for btc either despite all the hype and money go up. 🤔 seems a reasonable question? let's have a 😀 discussion on block sizes and 😂 get some real 👍 feedback on big vs small and 🔥 let the chips lay where they land. should btc return 👍 to being an moe, i 🔥 suspect the true value 🔥 will return. 🤔 here's hoping. GM 🙃",
"sig": "6b820a41dd602d7b9d55bb218acd36c9d93f2a7a7ee4a98fc6b9845680f13348a54caa4408c26e9f0b95681c3a9854ae9641b4b15f36ea2faec7ad000a0e6a70"
}