📅 Original date posted:2014-01-18 📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED ...

Jouke Hofman [ARCHIVE] /

npub1zvd…9a4a

2023-06-07 15:12:15

in reply to nevent1q…t5dh

📅 Original date posted:2014-01-18
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We rebroadcast incoming transactions without fees at several nodes,
including bc.info, to keep them in mempools.

On 01/17/2014 10:04 PM, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> CPFP is *extremely* important. People have lost money because this
> feature is missing. I think it's critical that it makes it into
> 0.9
>
> If I get a low-priority donation from a blockchain.info wallet,
> that money can disappear if it doesn't make it into a block in 24
> hours - bc.i will forget the transaction and happily respend its
> inputs on the next transaction that user makes.
>
> I wouldn't mind paying $1 in fees to receive a $50 donation. But
> without CPFP there's no way to do that.
>
>
> On 01/17/2014 12:53 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> <vendor hat: on> BitPay sure would like to see CPFP in
>> upstream.
>
>> I think the main hurdle to merging was that various people
>> disagreed on various edge case handling and implementation
>> details, but no fundamental objections.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In
> Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2mbQAAoJEIilnEpWGBYhH+8H/2nIZjrrZIPi/4ZeTi71cZOe
78oD4mzWM9zvRbjbGfIWrgTnkRQi4OQ/GorbRiyoAeKzAQ+SdeY8dkRsS14zpqpC
w4efoJOTxgi69giBWGPWlPvAtTwD65EcfJmUs5XeGi7J/3E0qTyry6sDu8t2ip84
hLUnqMOcNhc0J/k0KvBbEyl1YXcRWMjz5X2pMtY9yeMk+qFQPR1+RjZ+91OCRyui
Z47jhHlbhc5daXAWrq4fb54uNSJWUnYky7yN2pDTovAVq5PNNVNJTdxbjXSyYmcP
FwFNkARrgXRlSvf07FN991aa2u4CTkjRgA9uRrvcTtLXr8g2F0yymfPr0AQrgZg=
=J9Z4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Author Public Key

npub1zvde9x7jfl4rk5dpr8lywl5ylz7uy5uc67ugz7vtlqeemzljv44szt9a4a

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:12:15

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "6f1c45c666bd6e6dd8b8ae48c1e66dc43e724ed0af7863e2176eaae3d35f4bc0", "pubkey": "131b929bd24fea3b51a119fe477e84f8bdc25398d7b881798bf8339d8bf2656b", "created_at": 1686150735, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "2554c52a67cb4c628dbda8a8971cb49eac1625e5569c8f7b46b77f379d8a9cce", "", "root" ], [ "e", "92ad0ae65b857042d62a4e3c9dfdade58e13bc4cb81f86514d2cfb4e2d02c67c", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-18\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nWe rebroadcast incoming transactions without fees at several nodes,\nincluding bc.info, to keep them in mempools.\n\nOn 01/17/2014 10:04 PM, Mark Friedenbach wrote:\n\u003e CPFP is *extremely* important. People have lost money because this \n\u003e feature is missing. I think it's critical that it makes it into\n\u003e 0.9\n\u003e \n\u003e If I get a low-priority donation from a blockchain.info wallet,\n\u003e that money can disappear if it doesn't make it into a block in 24\n\u003e hours - bc.i will forget the transaction and happily respend its\n\u003e inputs on the next transaction that user makes.\n\u003e \n\u003e I wouldn't mind paying $1 in fees to receive a $50 donation. But \n\u003e without CPFP there's no way to do that.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e On 01/17/2014 12:53 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003cvendor hat: on\u003e BitPay sure would like to see CPFP in\n\u003e\u003e upstream.\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e I think the main hurdle to merging was that various people \n\u003e\u003e disagreed on various edge case handling and implementation\n\u003e\u003e details, but no fundamental objections.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\n\u003e \nCenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.\n\u003e Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For \n\u003e Critical Workloads, Development Environments \u0026 Everything In\n\u003e Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. \n\u003e http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431\u0026iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk\n\u003e\n\u003e \n_______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list \n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net \n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e \n\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2mbQAAoJEIilnEpWGBYhH+8H/2nIZjrrZIPi/4ZeTi71cZOe\n78oD4mzWM9zvRbjbGfIWrgTnkRQi4OQ/GorbRiyoAeKzAQ+SdeY8dkRsS14zpqpC\nw4efoJOTxgi69giBWGPWlPvAtTwD65EcfJmUs5XeGi7J/3E0qTyry6sDu8t2ip84\nhLUnqMOcNhc0J/k0KvBbEyl1YXcRWMjz5X2pMtY9yeMk+qFQPR1+RjZ+91OCRyui\nZ47jhHlbhc5daXAWrq4fb54uNSJWUnYky7yN2pDTovAVq5PNNVNJTdxbjXSyYmcP\nFwFNkARrgXRlSvf07FN991aa2u4CTkjRgA9uRrvcTtLXr8g2F0yymfPr0AQrgZg=\n=J9Z4\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----", "sig": "100b3aa9c7c8aad0986deb9e21e5b047e37cf3c5a87e0dc08aeabf7717c04cfcdc84e020796dfe5e0a8b1e9b1e1e6af62f36fc14c3607733d25cd35b5566163f" }