đđ§đ§đąđŠđ đđšđ§đ on Nostr: Not watching this full thing, but one guy is doing the annoying Destiny thing where ...
Not watching this full thing, but one guy is doing the annoying Destiny thing where he spergs out constantly and won't stop talking over people, while referencing as many stupid obscure facts as he can to seem knowledgeable, jumping on any bit of information introduce as those it's fake, all making the other guy look stupid. The other guy seems totally unprepared for this.
For instance, he's doing the 300ppm thing I've heard a bunch of times. "The reason there is visible chemical trace of this stuff because they used the smallest amount possible, and that won't leave a visible trace". Okay... where's the proof of any of that? Proof that they used "the smallest amount possible" to kill everyone? Where is the proof that is even the smallest amount? People act like a "leathal dose" is a set limit for everyone, when really it's just the smallest recorded amount that did kill someone. So is 300ppm the smallest useful leathal dose, or the smallest recorded? What's the time needed for the "smallest dose needed" to kill someone? Is it longer than larger doses, or is it the same? Also, if these chambers really were used constantly, for years, there would still be a uniform build up of this residue, regardless of the size used, so is there any proof at all that the smallest doses needed would leave no visible trace, and only a "statistically significant chemical trace" (a level which is always decided by the investigators, and not some predecided metric)?
For instance, he's doing the 300ppm thing I've heard a bunch of times. "The reason there is visible chemical trace of this stuff because they used the smallest amount possible, and that won't leave a visible trace". Okay... where's the proof of any of that? Proof that they used "the smallest amount possible" to kill everyone? Where is the proof that is even the smallest amount? People act like a "leathal dose" is a set limit for everyone, when really it's just the smallest recorded amount that did kill someone. So is 300ppm the smallest useful leathal dose, or the smallest recorded? What's the time needed for the "smallest dose needed" to kill someone? Is it longer than larger doses, or is it the same? Also, if these chambers really were used constantly, for years, there would still be a uniform build up of this residue, regardless of the size used, so is there any proof at all that the smallest doses needed would leave no visible trace, and only a "statistically significant chemical trace" (a level which is always decided by the investigators, and not some predecided metric)?