🆎 on Nostr: npub198t8k…5hasj good answer and I agree, because again, although I didn’t go to ...
npub198t8kgwqas59rvmnghzcdn6krzhxhpkyt2mt53e4g9sdnj74sszss5hasj (npub198t…hasj) good answer and I agree, because again, although I didn’t go to uni (and I think still wouldn’t have even if free) I see the wider benefit.
My question though was, if the anomaly being corrected was “education gets an exemption from vat”; which I agree is a slight anomaly then what is the reason for a new sub-anomaly, to make uni (which is education) still not be vatable?
My question though was, if the anomaly being corrected was “education gets an exemption from vat”; which I agree is a slight anomaly then what is the reason for a new sub-anomaly, to make uni (which is education) still not be vatable?