Anon on Nostr: Of course it exists otherwise also. For sure they need to make a decision. They thing ...
Of course it exists otherwise also.
For sure they need to make a decision.
They thing that upsets me is their false narrative on the why's and pro censorship language on their speech, and that is a red flag to me.
("Freedom of speech without SOME restrictions is not possible.. study history", "censorship resistsnce and privacy are contradictory")
We all understand that it isn't to figth the propagation of CSAM, but to stay compliant with law.
If law tomorrow want encryption broken like UK law on apple what do you think SimpleX will do?
For sure they need to make a decision.
They thing that upsets me is their false narrative on the why's and pro censorship language on their speech, and that is a red flag to me.
("Freedom of speech without SOME restrictions is not possible.. study history", "censorship resistsnce and privacy are contradictory")
We all understand that it isn't to figth the propagation of CSAM, but to stay compliant with law.
If law tomorrow want encryption broken like UK law on apple what do you think SimpleX will do?