Event JSON
{
"id": "67e0aa1d2599e5be98408afe3bc12a234600f1ed6ae09db1431db80a22a1c714",
"pubkey": "b81aec0fc1bd6a95dfc56df7b42760004d3da570a949491723dce2b5dde5ab2c",
"created_at": 1698767250,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e7f76f0d1fdf887c12cbf5eaf15dd3bb0b88f806051739f63200aae91a8a734e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"d55b2d6aac577ea18a4aececa98e8214d918d4504f98256aa7f950ec9e91e53e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/hewittlaw/statuses/111330410541799256",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg I'd say by volume there's a good chance that far more are \"trademark misuse\" than counterfeiting. Every case brought by \"Smiley\" \"Emoji\" \"Grumpy Cat\" (high volume frequent fliers) are about using the words in a descriptive way in a product description, NOT on the product itself. Not as a confusingly similar brand. Just the crime of describing the cat in your own cat illustration that you drew yourself grumpy.",
"sig": "bbbae07488dd9db4e988daa78829e7908d7643d3bed870e2fb07d590c07f9377f97f36eb252d746aa6f604660ebd7bc2b9e6a8eab7ce9004c4bb03c884517baf"
}