Event JSON
{
"id": "e2228e4800b886bac4acbd1febccf9afe0bcc054532ec9771ca14fa7ccfd1cac",
"pubkey": "b400fa7aeef902979f3076a5e121644bebdc8d0a23ffb0eb724dab671d4b6493",
"created_at": 1721210646,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"imeta",
"url https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/801/260/646/409/968/original/134617ebfaf5faaa.png",
"m image/png"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/@LukaszOlejnik/112801260955393480",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/LukaszOlejnik/statuses/112801260955393480",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.social/users/LukaszOlejnik/statuses/112801260955393480",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Interesting privacy evaluation of Topics API suggesting that privacy toll may be significant. This evaluation is based on a small dataset of browsing histories (n=1027). Do you think the results would hold for realistic datasets? I have some doubts (from experience of work on 200k bigger dataset). However, such evaluations of the privacy-utility tradeoff are unambiguously needed, and good. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.19577v1\nhttps://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/801/260/646/409/968/original/134617ebfaf5faaa.png\n",
"sig": "cfda8a3972d686314c59c49989c95e53e9169ea6896f6247149e5d1d3391eb823781b68c238c75de626401b500f104770598be7e883da90086546a2e490bd69d"
}