Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18 📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18
📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hardforks are not something where voting makes sense. They need consensus
>> among /nodes/, not majority among /miners/. No hardfork has ever had such
>> a
>> vote.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> I meant that since some of the new hard fork proposals use a voting system
> for activation, they may not want to establish that precedent.
I wonder how many people read
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008936.html
apart from you...
📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hardforks are not something where voting makes sense. They need consensus
>> among /nodes/, not majority among /miners/. No hardfork has ever had such
>> a
>> vote.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> I meant that since some of the new hard fork proposals use a voting system
> for activation, they may not want to establish that precedent.
I wonder how many people read
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008936.html
apart from you...