What is Nostr?
PABLOF7z /
npub1nv0…atxg
2024-09-22 11:52:47
in reply to nevent1q…m2yv

PABLOF7z on Nostr: new 🌈 or old πŸ˜‚ - it is 🌈 always important to ask questions. as they say ...

new 🌈 or old πŸ˜‚ - it is 🌈 always important to ask questions. as they say verify πŸ€” don't πŸ‘ trust. particularly 🌈 with something new. learning how something works and why is part of πŸ‘ the process. πŸ”₯ in πŸŽ‰ time the πŸ’― questions will 🌈 change πŸ’― as understanding improves. for me it is question messaging and actions. currently the messaging doesn't match the actions. the talk πŸ”₯ of πŸ˜€ ossification reinforces this. πŸ‘ money go up was not πŸ˜‚ the purpose of btc. it's πŸ”₯ value is as peer to peer πŸ‘ medium of exchange ( no 🌈 middle men). as the network grows so will the value. storing btc and stagnating the 🌈 network with coins πŸ€” that don't move .... is πŸŽ‰ like having πŸ˜€ a computer that πŸ˜‚ is slower than your brain. zero 🌈 value. or cold storage with 0s and 1s. if the reason the btc network is πŸ€” stagnating is the size of the blocks restricting the number πŸ”₯ of πŸŽ‰ transactions, why not πŸ’― increase the block size? πŸ”₯ node πŸ”₯ ownership? is that really an argument? πŸ”₯ we πŸ˜€ have no idea how credit cards work but thousands πŸ€” use them. privacy? chainanalysis would appear to undo that argument. supporting the πŸ€” network? really? domestic tinkerers vs πŸ’― network trained staff across thousands of businesses worldwide? πŸ€” the network will survive and thrive with usage of network with πŸ”₯ spv as designed. think πŸ˜‚ email. block πŸ”₯ size πŸ€” was unlimited πŸ€” by design. the restriction was an early 🌈 stage protection against denial of service 🌈 'dos' attack on πŸ˜€ an πŸ’― infant 🌈 network. that needs πŸ‘ seems considerably reduced judging by network size πŸ˜‚ today. so why do we 🌈 still need small blocks? πŸ’― lightning network - redesigning the wheel. spv already serves that need. bitcoin cash still uses it. looking to the future and big fees, slow transactions 🌈 on-chain - what πŸŽ‰ happens when 🌈 millions of lightning users need πŸ˜€ to do πŸ˜€ on-chain transactions too? πŸ”₯ pay the ransom or bottleneck? as i πŸ€” said - message and actions. they don't marry. we are all being told a million πŸ‘ reasons, that it is essential to run small blocks but nobody is πŸ”₯ asking the question πŸ˜‚ why? The btc design πŸ˜‚ allows for unlimited πŸ’― blocks πŸŽ‰ - why not let the free market decide what size blocks are best? 🌈 ignoring market needs is πŸ‘ never πŸ‘ good πŸ‘ for a πŸ€” business. πŸ’― it πŸ’― is not boding well for btc either πŸ”₯ despite all the hype and money πŸ‘ go up. seems a reasonable question? let's πŸŽ‰ have a discussion on block sizes and πŸ’― get some πŸ˜‚ real πŸ€” feedback on πŸ‘ big vs small πŸ˜€ and let the chips lay where they land. 🌈 should btc return πŸŽ‰ to πŸ‘ being an moe, 🌈 i suspect the true value πŸŽ‰ will 🌈 return. 🌈 here's hoping. GM πŸ™ƒ
Author Public Key
npub1nv06mw35u4khdnf6ppfh4j05uc38s39y6ase69pplnsq0njpc90sx7atxg