Rusty on Nostr: The Problem is that you’re approaching this solely from an energy perspective. ...
The Problem is that you’re approaching this solely from an energy perspective.
While it’s true that man-made RF radiation lacks the energy to cause thermal damage or directly break DNA bonds, these aren’t the only mechanisms by which non-native, non-ionizing radiation can be harmful.
The truth is that EMF research has evolved tremendously the last 30 years. The old idea that man made radiation (AC electric, AC magnetic, RF, Dirty electricity) is only harmful if it heats you is no longer scientifically valid. There are now hundreds of quality studies that show biological effects at exposures similar to consumer technology.
The impact goes beyond frequency, energy or power levels.
It’s a far more complex interaction within biological systems far below our level of perception.
While it’s true that man-made RF radiation lacks the energy to cause thermal damage or directly break DNA bonds, these aren’t the only mechanisms by which non-native, non-ionizing radiation can be harmful.
The truth is that EMF research has evolved tremendously the last 30 years. The old idea that man made radiation (AC electric, AC magnetic, RF, Dirty electricity) is only harmful if it heats you is no longer scientifically valid. There are now hundreds of quality studies that show biological effects at exposures similar to consumer technology.
The impact goes beyond frequency, energy or power levels.
It’s a far more complex interaction within biological systems far below our level of perception.
quoting note1kyp…5wpcI don’t understand people who advocate for sun bathing without sunblock but then freak out about Bluetooth and WiFi radiation.
You do know you’re getting much higher risk exposure in the sun? UV energy levels higher than Bluetooth or WiFi AND has ionizing potential…