Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-26 📝 Original message: Christopher Jamthagen ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-26
📝 Original message:
Christopher Jamthagen <cjamthagen at gmx.com> writes:
> When a HTLC's CLTV has expired, the receiver of the HTLC should not be
> able to use the pre-image to spend the output from a commitment
> transaction that has not been invalidated.
> Assume a circuit is established: Alice -> Bob -> Dave
Yes, I assume that the HTLC gets eliminated by a commitment transaction
update at (or before) that time.
We could add an additional delay for this case, but it seems like
overengineering?
Cheers,
Rusty.
📝 Original message:
Christopher Jamthagen <cjamthagen at gmx.com> writes:
> When a HTLC's CLTV has expired, the receiver of the HTLC should not be
> able to use the pre-image to spend the output from a commitment
> transaction that has not been invalidated.
> Assume a circuit is established: Alice -> Bob -> Dave
Yes, I assume that the HTLC gets eliminated by a commitment transaction
update at (or before) that time.
We could add an additional delay for this case, but it seems like
overengineering?
Cheers,
Rusty.