Fabio Manganiello on Nostr: npub1nfgwq…4w507 I think that wording matters here. Eventually it's up to the ...
npub1nfgwqne894es8msnjlkcnzhu7mafsrfa27t9ntjhm39z7wryq82qp4w507 (npub1nfg…w507) I think that wording matters here. Eventually it's up to the website to decide, what they deem "necessary".
If you're "fair" website, then by "necessary cookies" you probably mean the first-party cookies that should be required for your website to function properly. Without a session cookie in some form, every single request made to the website will have to be authenticated, for example, breaking user experience basically everywhere.
However, it should be noted that that kind of "first-party" cookies aren't actually covered by GDPR. The regulation clearly states that explicit consent is not required for first-party strictly functional cookies: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/. So if some websites still ask for explicit consent even for these, my suspicion is that, at least in some cases, they aren't so "first-party strictly functional only" after all.
If you're "fair" website, then by "necessary cookies" you probably mean the first-party cookies that should be required for your website to function properly. Without a session cookie in some form, every single request made to the website will have to be authenticated, for example, breaking user experience basically everywhere.
However, it should be noted that that kind of "first-party" cookies aren't actually covered by GDPR. The regulation clearly states that explicit consent is not required for first-party strictly functional cookies: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/. So if some websites still ask for explicit consent even for these, my suspicion is that, at least in some cases, they aren't so "first-party strictly functional only" after all.