pinkyjay on Nostr: I like steel men so here's mine: both arguments have merit since censor is ambiguous ...
I like steel men so here's mine: both arguments have merit since censor is ambiguous with at least two meanings:
1 - to remove/edit access to information
2 - to suppress intended information propagation which could come in the form pejorative framing without removal
However, when information is like water and someone wants filtered water because there are certain things they wish to prevent, it seems more like an expression of personal curation than censorious.
If one thinks curation is censorship, then Nostr will not be very fun as it scales. By that metric, not using all information would effectively be censorship and that's not reasonable.
1 - to remove/edit access to information
2 - to suppress intended information propagation which could come in the form pejorative framing without removal
However, when information is like water and someone wants filtered water because there are certain things they wish to prevent, it seems more like an expression of personal curation than censorious.
If one thinks curation is censorship, then Nostr will not be very fun as it scales. By that metric, not using all information would effectively be censorship and that's not reasonable.