KeithMukai on Nostr: "They" are irrelevant for SeedSigner since you can build it yourself and run the FOSS ...
"They" are irrelevant for SeedSigner since you can build it yourself and run the FOSS code completely permissionlessly. Those of us involved in the project have NO IDEA who has built a SeedSigner.
I disagree with your definition of "product". I think of a product as something that a company sells. We're a completely open source PROJECT. If you build a SeedSigner and run our code, none of the volunteers who work on the project profit from it.
SeedSigner + Silent Payments is a FOSS project adding (currently experimental) support for an open source protocol / technique.
No one asked me to start building support for Silent Payments in SeedSigner. No one paid me to do it.
I've spent quite a bit of time with bip47 in the past. Interest in bip352 is a natural progression.
Some conspiracy theories are interesting or incisive. This one isn't.
I disagree with your definition of "product". I think of a product as something that a company sells. We're a completely open source PROJECT. If you build a SeedSigner and run our code, none of the volunteers who work on the project profit from it.
SeedSigner + Silent Payments is a FOSS project adding (currently experimental) support for an open source protocol / technique.
No one asked me to start building support for Silent Payments in SeedSigner. No one paid me to do it.
I've spent quite a bit of time with bip47 in the past. Interest in bip352 is a natural progression.
Some conspiracy theories are interesting or incisive. This one isn't.