Masterofballs on Nostr: As to the red herring claim, I don't need examples of people lining up to have their ...
As to the red herring claim, I don't need examples of people lining up to have their genitals deleted because they weren't bullied enough. That would be proving a negative. You cannot absolutely prove a negative.
We can however, show many examples of people saying they were bullied for feminine behavior. And as a result hid that behavor in the closet. Which is positive proof bullying works.
I have not denied that the existence of a Eunuch Architype. This architype may have communist tendencies. But this is a strawman argument. The existence of a Eunuch communist architype does not disprove bullying being biologically based error correcting code.
Because a red herring is used to mislead and argument or question and is a distraction from the main issue, your claim that I am making a red herring argument is false. Further more your argument that trannies cut their balls off to lick boot is itself a red herring. It neither disproves my claim nor changes its conclusion whether it's true or false.
We can however, show many examples of people saying they were bullied for feminine behavior. And as a result hid that behavor in the closet. Which is positive proof bullying works.
I have not denied that the existence of a Eunuch Architype. This architype may have communist tendencies. But this is a strawman argument. The existence of a Eunuch communist architype does not disprove bullying being biologically based error correcting code.
Because a red herring is used to mislead and argument or question and is a distraction from the main issue, your claim that I am making a red herring argument is false. Further more your argument that trannies cut their balls off to lick boot is itself a red herring. It neither disproves my claim nor changes its conclusion whether it's true or false.