dtonon on Nostr: Other's inbox relay are transparent from user's point of view, who should not have to ...
Other's inbox relay are transparent from user's point of view, who should not have to worry about it.
I think that the main source of confusion is related to the fact the 99% of the time two different relays, inbox and outbox, are not really needed, they can be a single personal public relay.
Clients should just allow to add them, and only in an advanced configuration let the user tweak the read/write permissions (or deduce them by the actual permissions).
Then the user can be allowed to add an optional DM relay (suggesting that it enforces authentication), a search relay, etc.
As you see users think that the relay setting in Amethyst is quite confusing, after the Outbox model update; this approach could solve this.
I think that the main source of confusion is related to the fact the 99% of the time two different relays, inbox and outbox, are not really needed, they can be a single personal public relay.
Clients should just allow to add them, and only in an advanced configuration let the user tweak the read/write permissions (or deduce them by the actual permissions).
Then the user can be allowed to add an optional DM relay (suggesting that it enforces authentication), a search relay, etc.
As you see users think that the relay setting in Amethyst is quite confusing, after the Outbox model update; this approach could solve this.