Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13 📝 Original message:> > On further reflection, ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13
📝 Original message:>
> On further reflection, I'm not sure I understand this use case of the
> payment protocol. Since a PaymentRequest currently contains the
> Outputs that specify the addresses to send to, reusing a
> PaymentRequest like this without using stealth addresses implies
> address reuse.
Yes indeed ...... which is why we're talking about extending the protocol
(in a future version! the first version isn't even out yet!).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140113/21032b84/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:>
> On further reflection, I'm not sure I understand this use case of the
> payment protocol. Since a PaymentRequest currently contains the
> Outputs that specify the addresses to send to, reusing a
> PaymentRequest like this without using stealth addresses implies
> address reuse.
Yes indeed ...... which is why we're talking about extending the protocol
(in a future version! the first version isn't even out yet!).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140113/21032b84/attachment.html>